This is in
reference to the article titled „Dissent and Aadhaar“ appearing in the Indian Express
issue of May 8, 2017. http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/dissent-and-aadhaar-4645231/
I read the article with a lot of interest, however with
all due respect to him; I disagree with the author on several accounts. Firstly
why would any UID create dissent? This is not a new concept and has been widely
implemented in various countries of the world. Inspite of all these UID systems
in western countries they have not reached the zero-crime state, so neither
will we. In European countries and also the USA where, everything works fine
just with one’s unique social security number, one can access medical care and
so much more with this ID. Of course India is a huge country compared to other
smaller countries of Europe geography and population wise and hence implementation
will take time. There will be technical difficulties and mistakes. We are still
getting there. Initially Aadhaar was proposed to be a mandatory thing but later
had to be declared voluntary due to opposition from many sections of the
country. Making it voluntary defeats the entire purpose of this project. But as
you rightly pointed out that it will prevent identity theft, which is a big
concern given the numerous terrorist attacks (BTW, terrorism is a global
nuisance now). We are dealing with many more issues apart from corruption.
Firstly the connection of LPG with Aadhar has curbed black marketing of which
every common person has been a victim of, some or the other time. Getting the
correct spelling or age on the Aadhar card is not such a big hassle. Why should
the widow claiming pension, understate her age? You talk of corruption at
contractor level. Sadly corruption is a huge problem at all levels in our
society. So Aadhar at least removes it at the lower level, eliminating duplicity.
The BOFORS and 3G/4G kind of corruption
cannot be prevented with this. Our nation is fighting a battle at so many
fronts. We are evolving and Aadhar is not the end. It only makes the life of common
person easier, getting a SIM card, registering agreements, opening bank
accounts, applying for passport, licence etc. All these things had become painful
for the common man who was always caught in red-tapism and bureaucracy.
I am very
optimistic that Aadhar has come as a boon and should be made mandatory. It will
bring honesty and integrity among citizens. I have seen the benefits of it in
my life as a common citizen and even to my domestic helpers who belong to the
lower income group. Such articles only try to create confusion and hence ‘dissent’
they talk about in the article.